Although the computational and statistical trade-off for modeling single graphs, for instance using block models, is relatively well understood, extending such results to sequences of graphs has proven to be difficult. In this work, we propose two models for graph sequences that capture: (a) link persistence between nodes across time, and (b) community persistence of each node across time. In the first model, we assume that the latent community of each node does not change over time, and in the second model we relax this assumption suitably. For both of these proposed models, we provide computationally efficient inference algorithms, whose unique feature is that they leverage community detection methods that work on single graphs. We also provide experimental results validating the suitability of the models and the performance of our algorithms on synthetic instances.
Streaming adaptations of manifold learning based dimensionality reduction methods, such as Isomap, typically assume that the underlying data distribution is stationary. Such methods are not equipped to detect or handle sudden changes or gradual drifts in the distribution generating the stream. We prove that a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model that uses a manifold-specific kernel function and is trained on an initial batch of sufficient size, can closely approximate the state-of-art streaming Isomap algorithm. The predictive variance obtained from the GPR prediction is then shown to be an effective detector of changes in the underlying data distribution. Results on several synthetic and real data sets show that the resulting algorithm can effectively learns lower dimensional representation of high dimensional data in a streaming setting, while identify shifts in the generative distribution.
It is a widely accepted fact that data representations intervene noticeably in machine learning tools. The more they are well defined the better the performance results are. Feature extraction-based methods such as autoencoders are conceived for finding more accurate data representations from the original ones. They efficiently perform on a specific task in terms of 1) high accuracy, 2) large short term memory and 3) low execution time. Echo State Network (ESN) is a recent specific kind of Recurrent Neural Network which presents very rich dynamics thanks to its reservoir-based hidden layer. It is widely used in dealing with complex non-linear problems and it has outperformed classical approaches in a number of tasks including regression, classification, etc. In this paper, the noticeable dynamism and the large memory provided by ESN and the strength of Autoencoders in feature extraction are gathered within an ESN Recurrent Autoencoder (ESN-RAE). In order to bring up sturdier alternative to conventional reservoir-based networks, not only single layer basic ESN is used as an autoencoder, but also Multi-Layer ESN (ML-ESN-RAE). The new features, once extracted from ESN’s hidden layer, are applied to classification tasks. The classification rates rise considerably compared to those obtained when applying the original data features. An accuracy-based comparison is performed between the proposed recurrent AEs and two variants of an ELM feed-forward AEs (Basic and ML) in both of noise free and noisy environments. The empirical study reveals the main contribution of recurrent connections in improving the classification performance results.
Parameters in deep neural networks which are trained on large-scale databases can generalize across multiple domains, which is referred as ‘transferability’. Unfortunately, the transferability is usually defined as discrete states and it differs with domains and network architectures. Existing works usually heuristically apply parameter-sharing or fine-tuning, and there is no principled approach to learn a parameter transfer strategy. To address the gap, a parameter transfer unit (PTU) is proposed in this paper. The PTU learns a fine-grained nonlinear combination of activations from both the source and the target domain networks, and subsumes hand-crafted discrete transfer states. In the PTU, the transferability is controlled by two gates which are artificial neurons and can be learned from data. The PTU is a general and flexible module which can be used in both CNNs and RNNs. Experiments are conducted with various network architectures and multiple transfer domain pairs. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the PTU as it outperforms heuristic parameter-sharing and fine-tuning in most settings.
Inference is the process of using facts we know to learn about facts we do not know. A theory of inference gives assumptions necessary to get from the former to the latter, along with a definition for and summary of the resulting uncertainty. Any one theory of inference is neither right nor wrong, but merely an axiom that may or may not be useful. Each of the many diverse theories of inference can be valuable for certain applications. However, no existing theory of inference addresses the tendency to choose, from the range of plausible data analysis specifications consistent with prior evidence, those that inadvertently favor one’s own hypotheses. Since the biases from these choices are a growing concern across scientific fields, and in a sense the reason the scientific community was invented in the first place, we introduce a new theory of inference designed to address this critical problem. We derive ‘hacking intervals,’ which are the range of a summary statistic one may obtain given a class of possible endogenous manipulations of the data. Hacking intervals require no appeal to hypothetical data sets drawn from imaginary superpopulations. A scientific result with a small hacking interval is more robust to researcher manipulation than one with a larger interval, and is often easier to interpret than a classical confidence interval. Some versions of hacking intervals turn out to be equivalent to classical confidence intervals, which means they may also provide a more intuitive and potentially more useful interpretation of classical confidence intervals
Large-scale Gaussian process models are becoming increasingly important and widely used in many areas, such as, computer experiments, stochastic optimization via simulation, and machine learning using Gaussian processes. The standard methods, such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for parameter estimation and the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) for prediction, are generally the primary choices in many applications. In spite of their merits, those methods are not feasible due to intractable computation when the sample size is huge. A novel method for the purposes of parameter estimation and prediction is proposed to solve the computational problems of large-scale Gaussian process based models, by separating the original dataset into tractable subsets. This method consistently combines parameter estimation and prediction by making full use of the dependence among conditional densities: a statistically efficient composite likelihood based on joint distributions of some well selected conditional densities is developed to estimate parameters and then ‘composite inference’ is coined to make prediction for an unknown input point, based on its distributions conditional on each block subset. The proposed method transforms the intractable BLUP into a tractable convex optimization problem. It is also shown that the prediction given by the proposed method has a minimum variance for a given separation of the dataset.
Data-driven approaches to sequence-to-sequence modelling have been successfully applied to short text summarization of news articles. Such models are typically trained on input-summary pairs consisting of only a single or a few sentences, partially due to limited availability of multi-sentence training data. Here, we propose to use scientific articles as a new milestone for text summarization: large-scale training data come almost for free with two types of high-quality summaries at different levels – the title and the abstract. We generate two novel multi-sentence summarization datasets from scientific articles and test the suitability of a wide range of existing extractive and abstractive neural network-based summarization approaches. Our analysis demonstrates that scientific papers are suitable for data-driven text summarization. Our results could serve as valuable benchmarks for scaling sequence-to-sequence models to very long sequences.
Deep learning has transformed the computer vision, natural language processing and speech recognition. However, the following two critical questions are remaining obscure: (1) why deep neural networks generalize better than shallow networks? (2) Does it always hold that a deeper network leads to better performance? Specifically, letting $L$ be the number of convolutional and pooling layers in a deep neural network, and $n$ be the size of the training sample, we derive the upper bound on the expected generalization error for this network, i.e., \begin{eqnarray*} \mathbb{E}[R(W)-R_S(W)] \leq \exp{\left(-\frac{L}{2}\log{\frac{1}{\eta}}\right)}\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma^2}{n}I(S,W) } \end{eqnarray*} where $\sigma >0$ is a constant depending on the loss function, $0<\eta<1$ is a constant depending on the information loss for each convolutional or pooling layer, and $I(S, W)$ is the mutual information between the training sample $S$ and the output hypothesis $W$. This upper bound discovers: (1) As the network increases its number of convolutional and pooling layers $L$, the expected generalization error will decrease exponentially to zero. Layers with strict information loss, such as the convolutional layers, reduce the generalization error of deep learning algorithms. This answers the first question. However, (2) algorithms with zero expected generalization error does not imply a small test error or $\mathbb{E}[R(W)]$. This is because $\mathbb{E}[R_S(W)]$ will be large when the information for fitting the data is lost as the number of layers increases. This suggests that the claim ‘the deeper the better’ is conditioned on a small training error or $\mathbb{E}[R_S(W)]$.
Though impressive results have been achieved in visual captioning, the task of generating abstract stories from photo streams is still a little-tapped problem. Different from captions, stories have more expressive language styles and contain many imaginary concepts that do not appear in the images. Thus it poses challenges to behavioral cloning algorithms. Furthermore, due to the limitations of automatic metrics on evaluating story quality, reinforcement learning methods with hand-crafted rewards also face difficulties in gaining an overall performance boost. Therefore, we propose an Adversarial REward Learning (AREL) framework to learn an implicit reward function from human demonstrations, and then optimize policy search with the learned reward function. Though automatic evaluation indicates slight performance boost over state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in cloning expert behaviors, human evaluation shows that our approach achieves significant improvement in generating more human-like stories than SOTA systems.
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) provides a powerful framework for leveraging unlabeled data when labels are limited or expensive to obtain. SSL algorithms based on deep neural networks have recently proven successful on standard benchmark tasks. However, we argue that these benchmarks fail to address many issues that these algorithms would face in real-world applications. After creating a unified reimplementation of various widely-used SSL techniques, we test them in a suite of experiments designed to address these issues. We find that the performance of simple baselines which do not use unlabeled data is often underreported, that SSL methods differ in sensitivity to the amount of labeled and unlabeled data, and that performance can degrade substantially when the unlabeled dataset contains out-of-class examples. To help guide SSL research towards real-world applicability, we make our unified reimplemention and evaluation platform publicly available.
This paper provides the first meaningful documentation and analysis of an established technique which aims to obtain an approximate solution to linear programming problems prior to applying the primal simplex method. The underlying algorithm is a penalty method with naive approximate minimization in each iteration. During initial iterations an approach similar to augmented Lagrangian is used. Later the technique corresponds closely to a classical quadratic penalty method. There is also a discussion of the extent to which it can be used to obtain fast approximate solutions of LP problems, in particular when applied to linearizations of quadratic assignment problems.